Re: git-archimport

> If the two branches are related, and you want the imported git
> branches to be related, do
> 
>    git-archimport arch-eduforge@catalyst.net.nz--2004/scripts
> 
> that will bring all the stuff under scripts. If there are other
> branches or projects there that aren't related or you don't  want to
> pull, do
> 
>    git-archimport arch-eduforge@catalyst.net.nz--2004/scripts--base \
>         arch-eduforge@catalyst.net.nz--2004/scripts--oco
> 
> In any case, you shoud never pass the last token (base-0). Also, if
> you have filenames with spaces or funny chars, you'll want a patch
> that I'm about to post.
> 
> If you don't mind having this discussion on git@vger, could you
> forward it there?
> 
> cheers,
> 
> 
> martin
> 
> On 11/11/05, Kevin Geiss <kevin@desertsol.com> wrote:
> > hello, I was trying out the git-archimport script, I have a question.
> >
> > say I have two branches in tla (in the same archive):
> >
> > scripts--base--0
> > scripts--oco--0
> >
> > and scripts--oco--0--base-0 was tagged from scripts--base--0--patch-2.
> >
> > I first tried importing only the base branch, that worked fine. then
> > I started a new directory, and tried this:
> >
> > git arch-import -v archive/scripts--base--0 archive/scripts--oco--0
> >
> > and it keeps complaning about not being able to find scripts--oco--0--
> > patch-1.  patch-1 is just a regular commit in the tla archive.
> > (patch-2 and patch-3 are merges from scripts--base)
> >
> > anyway, am I understanding the paradigm of the git-archimport script?
> > that I should expect it to be able to create a git repository for me
> > from these 2 branches?
> >
> > thanks for any info
> >
>