Re: [ANNOUNCE] GIT 0.99.9g
- From
- Jim Radford <radford@blackbean.org>
- Date
- Nov 10, 2005, 18:54 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20051110185423.GA7212@blackbean.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmzkc2a3e.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 12:14:29AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I think archimport part needs to be split out just like its > svn/cvs cousins,
I don't agree. The chance of running git-archimport and not having arch installed is significantly less likely than the chance of not noticing that the git-archimport program exists because it was moved into a separate package that you didn't know you needed to install in the first place.
The main reason I see for splitting cvs and email import out is the non-standard dependencies, cvsps and perl(Email::Valid). While for svn import it's to keep from requiring subversion-perl of everone who installs git-core. This dependency is added automatically, so you cannot easily just ignore it like you can in the arch/tla case.
> and perhaps documentation into another separate package.
There is no need for a separate documentation RPM, since the documentation is marked as such and rpm has a standard way to avoid installing them (--excludedocs).
-Jim