Re: Expected Behavior?

From: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Date: Nov 8, 2005, 22:53 UTC
Message-ID: <20051108225320.GB4805@c165.ib.student.liu.se>
In-Reply-To: <7v7jbig6m7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 01:41:20PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 17 quoted lines

> Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> writes:
> 
> > Jon: You could try to this merge with the recursive merge strategy
> > (git merge -s recursive 'merge message' master dev) If you do, you
> > _should_ get something like:
> >
> >     CONFLICT (add/add): File file3 added non-identically in both
> >     branches. Adding as file3_master and file3_dev instead.
> >
> > You will then end up with file3_master and file3_dev in your working
> > tree, which corresponds to file3 in the master branch and file3 in the
> > dev branch, respectively.
> 
> Oops, I missed that part.  This is unsafe in theory, if you
> could overwrite existing file3_master or file3_dev.  Does that
> matter in practice?
>

It wont overwrite any existing files. If there is a file named 'file3_master' then the new file will be named 'file3_master_1' and if that file also exists the new file will be named 'file3_master_2', and so on.

- Fredrik