Re: cg-update question.
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Sep 12, 2005, 00:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050912000210.GA15630@pasky.or.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <43082A96.1070700@mozilla.org>
Dear diary, on Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:17:42AM CEST, I got a letter where Johnny Stenback <jst@mozilla.org> told me that...
> Hi all,
Hello,
Show 12 quoted lines
> I just realized that if I've got an uncommitted local change in a tree > and I update my tree with cg-update to merge in changes from a different > tree... cg-update will pull the changes and do the merge. So that's all > cool, but as it does the merge, it will re-write my local file that has > the uncommitted change, even if that file didn't change in the > repository I pulled from, i.e. nothing to merge for that file. > > This is, to me at least, not the desired behavior, if there's no reason > for cg-update to touch a file it shouldn't. > > Thoughts? If someone points me in the right direction I'm willing to > take a stab at fixing this myself...
can you provide a concrete example of such a situation? This should never ever happen - cg-update should refuse to touch any files containing uncommitted changes.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone. -- Alan Cox