Re: bogus merges

From: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sep 11, 2005, 18:36 UTC
Message-ID: <20050911193628.B24984@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <43244935.6060703@gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:11:49AM -0400, A Large Angry SCM wrote:

Show 22 quoted lines

> Martin Langhoff wrote:
> > On 9/11/05, Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >>On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 09:01:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>>I suspect rmk is using cogito-0.13
> >>Correct, and rmk will probably be extremely nervous about upgrading when
> >>0.14 appears.
> > 
> > Well, *actually* cogito-0.13 didn't include git-core, so we have to
> > look for the reasons elsewhere. Could be the leftover MERGE_HEAD
> > Daniel mentions.
> > 
> > Russel, can you confirm what git-core version you are/were running?
> 
> Russel,
> 
> How are you updating your tree to Linus'? If you are rsyncing from 
> kernel.org, you're probably getting a MERGE_HEAD with the rsync. A while 
> ago I got annoyed enough add the equivalent of:
> 
> 	rm -f ${LOCAL_REPOS}/.git/MERGE_HEAD
> 
> to my (very stupid) git rsync script.

I think you can forget MERGE_HEAD.  Why?  I use cogito for pulling.

cg-pull gets the head, and then rsyncs the objects found in the object directory. It doesn't touch MERGE_HEAD. None of the cogito scripts that I have know anything about MERGE_HEAD itself.

(Plus, it's actually a two stage pull - I have a cron-based cg-pull into a master repository on one box, which I then cg-pull to the development box which is only powered when I'm working.)

-- 
Russell King