Re: [RFC] undo and redo

> I guess I can see that.  I just see it as much easier to manage
> multiple undo-redo states manually.  I mean, I wouldn't make anyone
> use git directly if the difference between the two commands bothers
> them.  git seems too low a level.  I would think one of the
> procelains would be be a better level.  However, having a unified
> interface for all the porcelains seems a reasonable request.

> > 
> > Is there something wrong with having flexibility?  It seems most of the
> > criticism of this feature is that there is already a way to accomplish
> > what I want to do.  Tools that can't be used flexibly are not tools that
> > I like to use.  Heck, I'm on UNIX aren't I?
> > 
> > Oops, sorry for the rant.  I'm really not in a bad mood... really.  I
> > hope it didn't sound like that :-).  Oh, and I didn't mean to suggest
> > that git is not flexible in other regards.  I think its great!  Moving
> > along...
> > 
> > > Assuming your patch creation and application tools capture all the
> > > meta-data the SCM has (which I believe git does), it's pretty simple
> > > to simulate what you want manaully.  With only a handful of
> > > commands.
> > 
> > I can simulate git manually too with just a few more commands.  Where's
> > the cutoff?