Re: [RFC] Patches exchange is bad?

Junio C Hamano wrote:

>
>I would like to know a bit about "git format-patch" adding extra
>info that you needed to get rid of.  It shouldn't be necessary.
>

As example, in the rev d5a63b99835017d2638e55a7e34a35a3c1e80f1f from git the original subject is:

'   Alternate object pool mechanism updates.'

while, after the round-trip git-format-patch + git applymbox I have

'   [PATCH] Alternate object pool mechanism updates.'

The extra '[PATCH]' in the subject was introduced by git-format-patch --mbox.

Perpahs I have made something wrong.

Marco

		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs