Re: bisect gives strange answer
- From
- Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
- Date
- Aug 4, 2005, 18:27 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050804182717.GA2241@redhat.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <E1E0jiv-0003c4-00@skye.ra.phy.cam.ac.uk>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 06:41:41PM +0100, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: > > By any chance, is this patch causing you problems? > > No, sadly. But I had hopes! As I think about it more, there's no way > it could, since I have CONFIG_HOTPLUG=y, so moving the CONFIG_HOTPLUG > would not change anything (for those who don't know the patch, it is > appended below). > > My latest theory is that I fed bisect incorrect good/bad data. > Perhaps If I had checked out and compiled those intermediate versions > from scratch, each version in a separate directory, then I would have > got different answers. Two possible reasons:
Errrrm, if you don't compile/test those intermediate versions, how do you know whether to tag it good/bad ?
Dave