Re: cg update failing
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jul 20, 2005, 08:12 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050720081226.GA27102@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <m3oe8yw0ws.fsf@lugabout.cloos.reno.nv.us>
Dear diary, on Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 06:34:43AM CEST, I got a letter where James Cloos <cloos+vger-git@jhcloos.com> told me that...
Show 10 quoted lines
> >>>>> "Petr" == Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes: > > Petr> Huh. Well, you had to do uberweird things with your repository - > Petr> why did you cg-seek at all? What Cogito version is it? > > All I ever did was track and compile linus??? tree. IIRC, when the > first new tag was added after I cloned the tree I had to seek to > that tag to see the new versions of the files. But obviously > that was long enough before hg???s repo broke that I???d forgotten > how I???d done that....
Ah so. Well, yes, the first tag was IIRC weird since it was a tree tag, not a commit tag. That confused things, but it shouldn't be necessary anymore since all new tags are hopefully commits. That might somehow create the local modifications as well, although I don't have a clear idea how could be that possible. Well, there were some bugs like this in Cogito in the past, but that should be long fixed.
Thanks anyway,
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ If you want the holes in your knowledge showing up try teaching someone. -- Alan Cox