Re: Linus kernel tree corrupt?
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jul 10, 2005, 15:23 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050710152309.GE24249@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <42D01174.4050501@zytor.com>
Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 08:03:32PM CEST, I got a letter where "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> told me that...
Show 8 quoted lines
> Petr Baudis wrote: > > > >Yes, please do. I deprecated rsync a day before Linus "broke" http-pull. > >It's un-deprecated again for now in the latest Cogito. > > > > Presumably for packed repos you want to drop the --ignore-existing > --whole-file options I assume?
It _is_ unsafe for individual objects, and your packfile will be corrupt if you break it in the middle and not have --whole-file turned on, I assume. It would be ideal if we could make rsync allow resuming download of the file if interrupted, but not under the final name but in that hidden file it uses.
Show 21 quoted lines
> sent 339 bytes received 1802 bytes 4282.00 bytes/sec > total size is 410 speedup is 0.19 > Missing object of tag v2.6.11... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.11-tree... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.12... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.12-rc2... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.12-rc3... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.12-rc4... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.12-rc5... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.12-rc6... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.13-rc1... different source (obsolete tag?) > Missing object of tag v2.6.13-rc2... different source (obsolete tag?) > New branch: 0109fd37046de64e8459f8c4f4706df9ac7cc82c > Cloned (origin > rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > available as branch "origin") > Cloned to ./ (origin > rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > available as branch "origin") > > Is the "missing objects" thing spurious?
Yes, already fixed. Will release 0.12.1 soon.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ <Espy> be careful, some twit might quote you out of context..