Re: arch 2.0 first source available (git related)
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
- Date
- Jul 9, 2005, 11:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050709113942.GB26343@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <1120867947.5882.2.camel@dev1.seyza.com>
Dear diary, on Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 02:12:27AM CEST, I got a letter where Thomas Lord <lord@emf.net> told me that...
> 2.0 is very much git influenced but it brings some (imo significant) > improvements to the table.
Could you list some of the things interesting for us? What is the benefit of a prereq graph compared to just having a single shared object database? From the documentation, that's the only interesting thing I noticed which is different from git (and things like artificially limiting filename length to 256 characters).
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ <Espy> be careful, some twit might quote you out of context..