Re: cogito and tags propagation
- From
- Zack Brown <zbrown@tumblerings.org>
- Date
- Jun 12, 2005, 17:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050612174905.GA18751@tumblerings.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <9e4733910506120850f762078@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:50:08AM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
> If I add a tag to tree A, then go to tree B which depends on A and do > cg update. It says the branch is already fully merged. It's not > counting the addition of a tag as something that marks the tree dirty.
My impression is that tags are local to a given repo, i.e. they are not included by default in the publically accessible data. The repo owner has to somehow 'tell' people about the tags, in order for them to be able to get them.
Apparently this is useful because it allows smaller groups to work together with their own 'local' tags, without polluting the main tree.
Be well, Zack
Show 8 quoted lines
> > -- > Jon Smirl > jonsmirl@gmail.com > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Zack Brown