Re: do people use the 'git' command?
- From
- Tommy M. McGuire <mcguire@crsr.net>
- Date
- Jun 11, 2005, 16:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050611160135.GA6522@immutable.crsr.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vpsutz88z.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 12:02:20AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> But the real point of "git" wrapper is merely to present CVS and SVN > refugees the structure they are familiar with: a single command having > a set of subcommands.
CVS and SVN refugees (like me :-)) should probably be pointed to porcelain. Showing them a mixture of relatively unpolished "git <subcommand>" and "git-*" commands is not likely to impress them with the simplicity and elegance of the tool. I don't think the surface structure of "<command> <subcommand>" is an important factor, and the first time they see a 40-hex-digit number, they'll be headed for the hills.
> Personally I think removal of "git" script is a bad idea.
I'd agree, for the opposite reason: the git script is a decent interface for power users who don't want to use anything porcelainish. It also provides a good place to hang custom functionality.
-- Tommy McGuire