Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce "rev-list --stop-at=<commit>".
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- May 13, 2005, 05:29 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050513052901.GB16464@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7v3bssc770.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Dear diary, on Fri, May 13, 2005 at 02:15:15AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> told me that...
Show 6 quoted lines
> Additional option, --stop-at=<commit>, is introduced. The > git-rev-list output stops just before showing the named commit. > > This is based on Thoms Gleixner's patch but slightly reworked. > > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Won't apply for now - as I already said in the relevant thread, this makes no sense with the current git-rev-list output order, and even encourages using it in wrong way. It is ok when the merges are reported in a different way, but that's impossible without some repoid (I yet have to catch up with that thread :-).
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor