Re: Odd decision of git-pasky-0.7 to do a merge
- From
- Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Date
- Apr 29, 2005, 20:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050429215250.E30010@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504291043060.18901@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005 at 10:44:29AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> On Fri, 29 Apr 2005, Russell King wrote: > > Why it decided that a merge was necessary is beyond me. Any ideas? > > Did Linus forget to merge his tree properly? > > It looks like it was unable to find the right common ancestor. > > If you only had my stuff in it, the common ancestor _should_ have been the > parent (c60c390620e0abb60d4ae8c43583714bda27763f), which _should_ have > been your old top. > > But maybe merge-base didn't work right?
Yup - pasky-0.7 came out with some weird commit-id, but cogito-0.8 got it right. Now using cogito-0.8 here, so I'm no longer concerned about this particular problem.
-- Russell King