Re: A shortcoming of the git repo format
- From
- Tom Lord <lord@emf.net>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2005, 20:49 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200504272049.NAA14598@emf.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <426FF8C4.8080809@zytor.com>
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Linus Torvalds wrote: > > No, that's definitely _not_ the point. > > I repeat: git does not do any free-form parsin AT ALL. The links are in > well-defined places, and you do not ever search for them. And that's > really very very important. >
I know that. However, is that going to be true for all versions of the repository format over all time? If so, the repository format is brittle.
I think one has to understand Linus' posts as coming from the "head-down, steaming ahead for *MY* project cause you all suck" perspective and impose corresponding filters on his declarations of "LAW". At least that's the only way *I* can make sense of his latest contributions.
If you get git, just do the right thing -- Linus be damned.
-t