Re: Merge with git-pasky II.
- From
- Fabian Franz <fabianfranz@gmx.de>
- Date
- Apr 26, 2005, 21:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <200504262336.02583.FabianFranz@gmx.de>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504261400570.4678-100000@wax.eds.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 26. April 2005 23:28 schrieb Bram Cohen:
Show 8 quoted lines
> Now you've just gone off the deep end. This is an apples-to-apples > comparison. Please accept one of thee following two statements: > > (a) Git doesn't do merging, and none of the related new tools around it do > merging. > > (b) Codeville merge (sans rename functionality) would be superior for the > merging which will be done.
I have one very humble question:
Why don't you write and contribute some code for git to do good merging?
This would resolve all your problems.
I think the "magic-merge" command is quite exchangable and if your way works good and is compatible, then people will automatically start using that.
cu
Fabian -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCbrRdI0lSH7CXz7MRAkS4AJ9JEka71M0Zc6cizXhrYpHiKHhL0gCcD/3Q j+UnPU/cXafGjGG6Bt9mZE8= =IYk0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----