Re: [FILE] GNU BIT
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Apr 25, 2005, 21:46 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050425214617.GH13467@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.58.0504251430380.11722@sam.ics.uci.edu>
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:33:12PM CEST, I got a letter where Andreas Gal <gal@uci.edu> told me that...
> bit contains various pieces and snippets from Linus' and your scripts and > thus automatically falls under GPL. Maybe I should have stated that > somewhere explicitly, but its a 800 lines bash script for crying out loud.
I skimmed over it briefly and admitelly didn't find anything *obviously* borrowed from my scripts, so I wanted to ask. It is worth noting explicitly, I think.
> The "GNU" part was actually more like a joke. If you feel offended by it, > I am happy to remove it. Are there any trademark issues involved in using > "GNU"?
I was not offended, just confused. :-) I think it's better not to use "GNU" in the name if it's not part of the GNU project.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor