Re: "True" git merge in git-pasky
- From
- Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2005, 23:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050419234057.GA14807@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050419035107.GB5554@pasky.ji.cz>
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> : [...]
Show 11 quoted lines
> Now you decided to do a little bit of parallel development and stick > your patches not ready for 2.6.12 to a separate tree. That's fine, do > > git fork experimental ~/linux-2.6.experimental > > and get some coffee. (It takes about 8 minutes here, but I think git > isn't at fault - it is probably all spent in > > read-tree $(tree-id) > checkout-cache -a > update-cache --refresh
Tip of the day: cat the whole tree to /dev/null before the fork
-- Ueimor