Re: space compression (again)
- From
- Martin Uecker <muecker@gmx.de>
- Date
- Apr 19, 2005, 12:39 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050419123935.GA8091@macavity>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050416173702.GA12605@macavity>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 07:37:02PM +0200, Martin Uecker wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 11:11:00AM -0400, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> > The rsync approach does not use fixed chunk boundaries; this is necessary > > to ensure good storage reuse for the expected case (ie; inserting a single > > line at the start or in the middle of the file, which changes all the > > chunk boundaries). > > Yes. The chunk boundaries should be determined deterministically > from local properties of the data. Use a rolling checksum over > some small window and split the file it it hits a special value (0). > This is what the rsyncable patch to zlib does.
This is certainly uninteresting for source code repositories but for people who manage repositories of rsyncable binary packages this would save a lot of space, bandwidth and cpu time (compared to rsync because the scanning phase is not necessary anymore).
Martin
-- One night, when little Giana from Milano was fast asleep, she had a strange dream.