Re: SCSI trees, merges and git status
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Apr 18, 2005, 23:28 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050418232803.GP5554@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <7vmzrvsm8j.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 01:23:24AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> told me that...
Show 6 quoted lines
> However the "Getting object database" part trashed this symlink > when I tried to pull from my other repo locally. I am wondering > it the following might be a better alternative. A possible > downside in this approach is that you would not pull .git/heads > and .git/tags (i.e. Pesky stuff) from the remote anymore. Is it > a problem (I am also CC'ing Petr to hear his opinion on this).
Getting tags is probably nice. You should definitively not get .git/heads, though. Those are your private stuff mostly, and the HEAD you "export" is .git/HEAD.
I'm thinking about this yet, since it might be useful to be able to export multiple branches without needing to set up multiple rsync URLs... you still don't want the heads/ directory en block, though.
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor