Re: [4/5] Add option for hardlinkable cache of extracted blobs
- From
- Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
- Date
- Apr 17, 2005, 20:58 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050417215854.H13233@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.21.0504171600310.30848-100000@iabervon.org>
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 04:03:46PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Show 9 quoted lines
> Actually, the documentation I've got says: > > "F_OK requests checking whether merely testing for the existence of the > file would be allowed (this depends on the permissions of the directories > in the path to the file, as given in path-name.)" > > So it shouldn't complain about a filename which you're allowed to try to > stat, even if there's nothing there. And it would depend on the privs of > the wrong user in looking at the path.
Isn't it the case that with selinux, various objects may be hidden depending on their accessibility? I wonder if this has an effect here.
(or what about any other security model?)
-- Russell King