Re: Re: Re: full kernel history, in patchset format
- From
Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>
- Date
- Apr 16, 2005, 18:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050416183656.GI19099@pasky.ji.cz>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050416183232.GH19099@pasky.ji.cz>
Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 08:32:32PM CEST, I got a letter where Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz> told me that...
Show 11 quoted lines
> Dear diary, on Sat, Apr 16, 2005 at 09:23:40PM CEST, I got a letter > where Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> told me that... > > One remark on the tree blob storage format. > > The binary storage of the sha1sum of the refered object is a PITA for > > scripting. > > Converting the ASCII -> binary for the sha1sum comparision should not > > take much longer than the binary -> ASCII conversion for the file > > reference. Can this be changed ? > > Huh, you aren't supposed to peek into trees directly. What's wrong with > ls-tree?
(I meant, you aren't supposed to peek into trees from scripts. Or well, not "not supposed", but it does not make much sense when you have ls-tree.)
-- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ C++: an octopus made by nailing extra legs onto a dog. -- Steve Taylor