Re: Index/hash order
- From
- Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
- Date
- Apr 13, 2005, 20:18 UTC
- Message-ID
- <20050413201836.GA27694@elte.hu>
- In-Reply-To
- <20050413201523.GC27088@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
Show 7 quoted lines
> > I think abusing the immutable bit quickly will decend into the same > > rathole which makes u-w often useless. u-w will actually be preserved > > by more tools -- simply because they know about it -- than +i. > > well, the 'owned by another user' solution is valid though, and doesnt > have this particular problem. (We've got a secure multiuser OS, so can > as well use it to protect the DB against corruption.)
but ... this variant doesnt have any 'wow' feeling to it either, and it clearly brings in a number of other limitations. I might as well shut up until i can suggest something obviously superior :)
Ingo