Re: [PATCH 00/25] [RFC] Bundle URIs
- From
Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
- Date
- Apr 7, 2022, 19:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1b63a8eb-9a6d-a07e-9070-9cdc0c4d5a1c@github.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <ddebc223-1e13-e758-f9b1-d3f23961e459@github.com>
On 3/8/2022 12:15 PM, Derrick Stolee wrote:
Show 19 quoted lines
> On 3/4/2022 10:12 AM, Derrick Stolee wrote: >> On 3/4/2022 9:49 AM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >>> Also, as noted in the upthread >>> <220224.86czjdb22l.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> it might be useful to chat >>> in a more voice/video medium in parallel (maybe mid-next-week) about the >>> high-level ideas & to get a feel for our goals, conflicts etc. Doing >>> that over very long E-Mail exchanges (and the fault of "long" there is >>> mostly on my side:) can be a bit harder... >> >> I agree. I we can work out a time in a private thread and I can send >> you a video call invite. > > Ævar and I just finished our chat and came away with these two > action items: > > 1. Ævar will finish prepping his RFC as-is and send it to the list. > It contains several deeply technical optimizations that are > critical to how his model works, but could also be used to > improve scenarios in the table of contents model.
Ævar: I'm still waiting on the full version of this. While you updated [1] your original RFC [2], it was incomplete. I am still looking forward to seeing your full vision of how it works with incremental fetch and how your optimizations to download only the headers of the bundles will work.
[1] [RFC PATCH v2 00/13] bundle-uri: a "dumb CDN" for git
https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-v2-00.13-00000000000-20220311T155841Z-avarab@gmail.com/[2] [RFC PATCH 00/13] Add bundle-uri: resumably clones, static "dumb" CDN etc.
https://lore.kernel.org/git/RFC-cover-00.13-0000000000-20210805T150534Z-avarab@gmail.com/> 2. Ævar will then do a round of taking both series and combining > them in a way that allows the union of possible functionality > to work.
Or perhaps you are jumping straight to this part?
Show 5 quoted lines
> 3. As these things come out, I will make it a priority to read the > patches and provide feedback focusing on high-level concepts > and ways we can split the future, non-RFC series into chunks > that provide incremental functionality while keeping review > easier than reading the whole series.
I'm still looking forward to seeing progress in this area. Please let me know what your plan is here.
Thanks, -Stolee