Re: how to update origin/<branch> after a push to origin <branch>?
- From
- layer <layer@known.net>
- Date
- May 14, 2009, 05:01 UTC
- Message-ID
- <19997.1242277316@relay.known.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <32541b130905132158s44cc5b19n974901c05cf025b2@mail.gmail.com>
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 17 quoted lines
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:42 AM, layer <layer@known.net> wrote: >> > after the push, I still see the names of the files I pushed because I >> > haven't updated origin/master yet, with a fetch. Of course, a "git >> > pull" would do it, but I don't want to do that, because I might be >> > using something other than `origin' and I don't want anything but the >> > single branch. >> > >> > So, I naively thought that >> > >> > git fetch origin master >> > >> > would do the trick, but after that command the git diff above still >> > shows the same files. >> >> Short answer: >> >> git fetch origin
I'm pretty sure I tried that. I'll certainly verify it once I figure out how to unwedge my repo.
>> However, 'git push origin master' should update origin/master >> automatically, at least in relatively recent git versions. It's >> rather weird if that didn't happen.
That's what I thought. Using git version 1.6.1.3 (client and server are the same machine).