Re: git: list of my complaints about future graft removal

 ---- On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:11:30 +0400  Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote --- 
 > So shallow clones should use git-replace(1) under the hood (both on initial
 > clone, deepening with --shallow-since and --unshallow), right?

You are asking me? I'm not git developer.

What you mean? How git works currently or how it should work in 3.0?

I don't know how it works currently.

And I don't know how it will work in the future.

I just want "git clone --depth=1" to continue to work. I. e. git developers should somehow take measures to make sure "git clone --depth=1" will continue to work even if grafts will be removed.

Currently "git clone --depth=1" seems to be implemented using grafts, i. e. I see word "grafted" in "git log" output if I use "git clone --depth=1" (I just tested this on git 2.47.2)

-- Askar Safin https://types.pl/@safinaskar