Re: pull into dirty working tree
- From
Bill Lear <rael@zopyra.com>
- Date
- Jun 13, 2007, 15:36 UTC
- Message-ID
- <18032.3836.710438.73912@lisa.zopyra.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1HyUO6-04z4yG0@fwd28.aul.t-online.de>
On Wednesday, June 13, 2007 at 17:03:58 (+0200) MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de writes:
Show 5 quoted lines
>Hi, > >why don't they just do a simple >git commit -a >of their work before pulling?
Because they are basically playing with some code and don't want to commit it.
>That's different to cvs! Committing only affects the cloned repository.
Yup, we realize that.
>I think one of the biggest advantages of git is the concept of everyone >working on a clone. So developers are not prevented from actually using >revision control just because they are afraid of disturbing others. They >don't until they e.g. push!
Right, but they just want updates to their working tree, as they could do under CVS, without issuing five (or even one) other commands.
Bill