git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Re: A note from the maintainer

From
Brian Lyles <brianmlyles@gmail.com>
Date
Mar 22, 2024, 01:14 UTC
Message-ID
<17bef1274bfb2614.70b1dd9aae081c6e.203dcd72f6563036@zivdesk>
In-Reply-To
<xmqqwmpvbufw.fsf@gitster.g>
Show 31 quoted lines
> "Brian Lyles" <brianmlyles@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>>> I actually meant what I wrote.
>>> 
>>> It is possible that the reason why your patch did not receive any
>>> response was because it was uninspiring, looked useless, and did not
>>> deserve anybody's attention.  But it is also possible that it was
>>> lost in the noise.
>>> ...
>> Thanks for the clarification. I do still think that a change in the
>> wording and tone of this section could help make the project appear more
>> friendly to new contributors. Phrases like "totally uninteresting",
>> "uninspiring", "looked useless", and "did not deserve anybody's
>> attention" are all fairly harsh sounding, even if sometimes true.
> 
> You completely lost me.  How much harsh words are used before "But
> it is also possible" would not make the project sound less friendly
> at all.
> 
> Let me try again.
> 
> You see your patch was sent but did not receive any reaction.  You
> might start thinking: "hmm, perhaps my patch was so horrible" and
> you might think all the bad and harsh things about the quality of
> your patch.
> 
> But do not let such thought stop you from pinging the thread again,
> because the quality of your patch may not at all be the reason why
> you did not receive any reaction.  It could be just people were
> swamped and your patch fell into cracks, and there was nothing wrong
> with it.

Ah, okay -- I think I am better understanding the intent vs. how I (mis)interpreted it initially. My initial interpretation was more along the lines of "there are two possibilities: Either it was uninteresting, or it got missed". This re-phrasing reads more as "don't assume it was uninteresting, it may have simply been missed". Both true, but the latter reads better in my opinion.

Thank you for clarifying. I will let you decide if some updated wording is warranted in future notes from the maintainer, or if I simply interpreted things in a way that you do not think others would.

-- 
Thank you,
Brian Lyles
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 6 of 9 in “A note from the maintainer”
  1. Junio C HamanoMar 20, 2024
  2. Brian LylesMar 21, 2024
  3. Junio C HamanoMar 21, 2024
  4. Brian LylesMar 21, 2024
  5. Junio C HamanoMar 21, 2024
  6. Brian LylesMar 22, 2024
  7. Junio C HamanoMar 22, 2024
  8. Brian LylesMar 22, 2024
  9. Junio C HamanoMar 22, 2024

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.