Re: Make "gitk" work better with dense revlists
- From
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
- Date
- Oct 27, 2005, 06:16 UTC
- Message-ID
- <17248.28857.90315.543669@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510251253110.10477@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds writes:
> So this makes gitk just show the diff of _that_ commit.
Committed and pushed out, but ...
> Also, having now tested the previous "handle root commit in the > TREECHANGED" logic a bit more, I think it's (a) stable and (b) the right > thing to do. Sign me off on that one too.
What is that about?
I'm hoping to get back to gitk hacking RSN - I've been going flat out on the ppc32/ppc64 merge. Thanks for doing the --dense thing; I was thinking about doing something like that inside gitk but doing it in git-rev-list is better. It does mean that I now want to be able to get gitk to contract the view to just a given set of files or directories and then expand back to the whole tree view, which means running git-rev-list multiple times, which gitk can't do at the moment...
Paul.