Re: [RFE] Allow for "interactive"-like actions in non-interactive rebase
- From
- Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
- Date
- May 7, 2019, 00:02 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1557187347.2481.0@yandex.ru>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAPig+cTC8aGkM3ksG9cEapz33-FcjsvoO9ejeJzjmkyXHjvoJQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Пн, May 6, 2019 at 18:25, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> wrote:
Show 31 quoted lines
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 4:30 PM Emily Shaffer > <emilyshaffer@google.com> wrote: >> On Fri, May 03, 2019 at 06:04:15PM +0300, Konstantin Kharlamov >> wrote: >> > Interactive rebase (i.e. for example "git rebase -i HEAD~10") is >> used most >> > often to apply an action to a single commit, e.g. "rename", >> "edit", "fixup", >> > etc… >> > >> > Instead, it would be nice to have native support in git to start >> "rebase" >> > for a given commit, and pass the "interactive action" to use on >> that commit. >> > >> > $ git rebase -i HEAD~10 --action edit >> > $ git rebase -i HEAD~10 --action rename >> > $ git rebase -i HEAD~10 --action fixup >> >> I would totally use this. The equivalent workflow right now is a >> pretty >> large number of steps for, say, fixing a typo. > > Isn't this pretty much what Phil Hord's RFC patch series[1] was about? > However, Junio outlined[2] a generalization of that approach providing > more flexibility and control. > > [1]: > https://public-inbox.org/git/20190422000712.13584-1-phil.hord@gmail.com/ > [2]: > https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqk1fm9712.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/
Thanks, indeed it is. I replied on the corresponding emails.