Re: [PATCH] worktree add: sanitize worktree names
- From
- Konstantin Kharlamov <hi-angel@yandex.ru>
- Date
- Feb 21, 2019, 11:44 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1550749488.30307.2@yandex.ru>
- In-Reply-To
- <CACsJy8AERM==LunYTszUf1Fb-uHPZLjkSE5x1T=0Ueqsvq3F_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Чт, Feb 21, 2019 at 2:38 PM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
Show 86 quoted lines
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 6:28 PM Konstantin Kharlamov
> <hi-angel@yandex.ru> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Чт, Feb 21, 2019 at 2:00 PM,
>> =?UTF-8?b?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Worktree names are based on $(basename $GIT_WORK_TREE). They
>> aren't
>> > significant until 3a3b9d8cde (refs: new ref types to make
>> per-worktree
>> > refs visible to all worktrees - 2018-10-21), where worktree name
>> could
>> > be part of a refname and must follow refname rules.
>> >
>> > Update 'worktree add' code to remove special characters to follow
>> > these rules. The code could replace chars with '-' more than
>> > necessary, but it keeps the code simple. In the future the user
>> will
>> > be able to specify the worktree name by themselves if they're not
>> > happy with this dumb character substitution.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: hi-angel@yandex.ru
>> > Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
>> > ---
>> > builtin/worktree.c | 47
>> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> > t/t2025-worktree-add.sh | 5 +++++
>> > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/builtin/worktree.c b/builtin/worktree.c
>> > index 3f9907fcc9..ff36838a33 100644
>> > --- a/builtin/worktree.c
>> > +++ b/builtin/worktree.c
>> > @@ -262,6 +262,46 @@ static void validate_worktree_add(const char
>> > *path, const struct add_opts *opts)
>> > free_worktrees(worktrees);
>> > }
>> >
>> > +/*
>> > + * worktree name is part of refname and has to pass
>> > + * check_refname_component(). Remove unallowed characters to
>> make it
>> > + * valid.
>> > + */
>> > +static void sanitize_worktree_name(struct strbuf *name)
>> > +{
>> > + int i;
>> > +
>> > + /* no ending with .lock */
>> > + if (ends_with(name->buf, ".lock"))
>> > + strbuf_remove(name, name->len - strlen(".lock"),
>> > + strlen(".lock"));
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * All special chars replaced with dashes. See
>> > + * check_refname_component() for reference.
>> > + */
>> > + for (i = 0; i < name->len; i++) {
>> > + if (strchr(":?[]\\~ \t@{}*/.", name->buf[i]))
>> > + name->buf[i] = '-';
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + /* remove consecutive dashes, leading or trailing dashes */
>> > + for (i = 0; i < name->len; i++) {
>> > + while (name->buf[i] == '-' &&
>> > + (i == 0 ||
>> > + i == name->len - 1 ||
>> > + (i < name->len - 1 && name->buf[i + 1] ==
>> '-')))
>> > + strbuf_remove(name, i, 1);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + /* last resort, should never ever happen in practice */
>> > + if (name->len == 0)
>> > + strbuf_addstr(name, "worktree");
>>
>> I assume this means a user have passed a zero-sized worktree name?
>> But
>> zero-sized file/directory names are not possible anyway, would it
>> make
>> sense to just return an error in this case?
>
> It could happen if you do "git worktree add .lock". The ".lock" part
> will be stripped out, leaving us with an empty string.Ah, I see. Then, would it maybe make sense to just sanitize the ".lock" out the same way as you did with special symbols, i.e. with dashes?
(I am not a git developer, so not sure if that's a good question, but I would also question why ".lock" needs to be deleted. I guess git uses the postfix internally, but why can't it be okay with "name.lock.lock")