Re: [PATCH v2] builtin/mv.c: fix possible segfault in add_slash()
- From
Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com>
- Date
- Sep 9, 2022, 22:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <150fabf7-0b5b-9029-0d60-f83885c0cc41@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqo7voiaaf.fsf@gitster.g>
On 9/9/2022 1:04 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 22 quoted lines
> Shaoxuan Yuan <shaoxuan.yuan02@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> A possible segfault was introduced in c08830de41 (mv: check if
>> <destination> is a SKIP_WORKTREE_DIR, 2022-08-09).
>>
>> When running t7001 with SANITIZE=address, problem appears when running:
>>
>> git mv path1/path2/ .
>> or
>> git mv directory ../
>> or
>> any <destination> that makes dest_path[0] an empty string.
>>
>> The add_slash() call could segfault when dest_path[0] is an empty string,
>> because it was accessing a null value in such case.
>
> Terminology. The relevant preimage is
>
>> size_t len = strlen(path);
>> - if (path[len - 1] != '/') {
>
> An access to path[-1] is an out-of-bounds access.Thanks for the term, new thing learned :-)
Show 13 quoted lines
>> Change add_slash() to check the path argument is a non-empty string >> before accessing its value. If the path is empty, return it as-is. > > That is not wrong per-se, but... > >> Explanation: > > ... you'd need this funny label here. If this is where your > explanation begins, what was the reader reading before it? ;-) > > The logic would flow more naturally if you added your "explanation" > material between "what is wrong in the current code" and "what to do > to fix it", perhaps like so:
Indeed, explanation before action sounds more reasonable.
Show 15 quoted lines
> ... could segfault when path argument to it is an empty > string, because it makes an out-of-bounds read to decide if > an extra slash '/' needs to be appended to it. > > As add_slash() is used to make sure that a valid pathname to > a file in the given directory can be made by appending a > filename after the value returned from it, if path is an > empty string, we want to return it as-is. The path to a > file "F" in the top-level of the working tree (i.e. > path=="") is formed by appending "F" after "" (i.e. path) > without any slash in between. > > So, just like the case where a non-empty path already ends > with a slash, return an empty path as-is. >
Thanks for the paraphrase, I put it in the v3 just sent.
Show 16 quoted lines
>> diff --git a/builtin/mv.c b/builtin/mv.c
>> index 2d64c1e80f..3413ad1c9b 100644
>> --- a/builtin/mv.c
>> +++ b/builtin/mv.c
>> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static const char **internal_prefix_pathspec(const char *prefix,
>> static const char *add_slash(const char *path)
>> {
>> size_t len = strlen(path);
>> - if (path[len - 1] != '/') {
>> + if (len && path[len - 1] != '/') {
>> char *with_slash = xmalloc(st_add(len, 2));
>> memcpy(with_slash, path, len);
>> with_slash[len++] = '/';
>
> Yup. It cannot be seen in the patch but the post-context of this
> hunk just returns path as-is, which is what we want to happen.Yes.
Thanks, Shaoxuan