Re: Mark remote `gc --auto` error messages
- From
Lukas Fleischer <lfleischer@lfos.de>
- Date
- Jun 2, 2016, 20:06 UTC
- Message-ID
- <146489800609.1944.4398103814754920753@typhoon.lan>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqinxrtmgi.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
On Thu, 02 Jun 2016 at 21:33:33, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 11 quoted lines
> Lukas Fleischer <lfleischer@lfos.de> writes: > > > When running `git push`, it might occur that error messages are > > transferred from the server to the client. While most messages (those > > explicitly sent on sideband 2) are prefixed with "remote:", it seems > > that error messages printed during the automatic householding performed > > by git-gc(1) are displayed without any additional decoration. Thus, such > > messages can easily be misinterpreted as git-gc failing locally, see [1] > > for an actual example of where that happened. > > Sounds like a sensible goal to me.
What exactly are you referring to (you only quoted the introduction)? Do you think we should fix the git-gc issue but keep the general behavior of printing messages unaltered? Do you think it would be worthwhile to make server messages distinguishable in general?