[PATCH 04/10] t/t6015-rev-list-show-all-parents.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
- From
Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
- Date
- Jan 7, 2016, 13:51 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1452174710-28188-5-git-send-email-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1452174710-28188-1-git-send-email-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
perl -i -pe 'BEGIN{undef $/;} s/`(.+?)`/\$(\1)/smg' "${_f}"
doneand then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> --- t/t6015-rev-list-show-all-parents.sh | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6015-rev-list-show-all-parents.sh b/t/t6015-rev-list-show-all-parents.sh index 8b146fb..3c73c93 100755 --- a/t/t6015-rev-list-show-all-parents.sh +++ b/t/t6015-rev-list-show-all-parents.sh @@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ test_description='--show-all --parents does not rewrite TREESAME commits' test_expect_success 'set up --show-all --parents test' ' test_commit one foo.txt && - commit1=`git rev-list -1 HEAD` && + commit1=$(git rev-list -1 HEAD) && test_commit two bar.txt && - commit2=`git rev-list -1 HEAD` && + commit2=$(git rev-list -1 HEAD) && test_commit three foo.txt && - commit3=`git rev-list -1 HEAD` + commit3=$(git rev-list -1 HEAD) ' test_expect_success '--parents rewrites TREESAME parents correctly' '
-- 2.3.3.GIT