Re: Building Git with HTTPS support: avoiding libcurl?
- From
Paul Smith <paul@mad-scientist.net>
- Date
- Dec 22, 2015, 17:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1450805416.11255.58.camel@mad-scientist.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <CAD0k6qT+s4e_7y1DxVTN63V0tO_xFv-9i-Fmq5O0SrpQAyAzVA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 09:08 -0800, Dave Borowitz wrote:
> Well, IIUC one of the reasons for Git's fork-everything strategy is to > avoid having to dynamically link the core git binary against large > libraries like libcurl, so the dependency size has been taken into > account at least in that sense.
Sure, and it's great that I still get most Git even if I don't have libcurl.
But without support for cloning https remotes there's a significant hole in Git functionality...
I grok that Git doesn't want to re-invent the wheel and that libcurl is convenient. I just wonder if anyone knows of another wheel, that doesn't come attached to an entire tractor-trailer, that could be used instead :).