Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2015, #05; Mon, 20)

From: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Date: Jul 21, 2015, 16:36 UTC
Message-ID: <1437496610.30911.15.camel@twopensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsi8iw0pz.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>

On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 22:15 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

Show 25 quoted lines

> David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes:
> 
> >> * dt/refs-backend-preamble (2015-07-13) 7 commits
> >>  - git-stash: use update-ref --create-reflog instead of creating files
> >>  - update-ref and tag: add --create-reflog arg
> >>  - refs: add REF_FORCE_CREATE_REFLOG flag
> >>  - git-reflog: add exists command
> >>  - refs: new public ref function: safe_create_reflog
> >>  - refs: Break out check for reflog autocreation
> >>  - refs.c: add err arguments to reflog functions
> >> ...
> >>  Still under discussion.
> >> 
> >>  Will hold.
> >
> > What's left to discuss on this one? I think the latest version addresses
> > all concerns, but I'm happy to do another reroll or discuss further if
> > necessary.
> 
> I think I found the series more or less ready when I saw v7, but
> there was a good discussion between Michael Haggerty and you on that
> round after I thought so, and then you posted the reroll (v8) which
> is what is queued above.  As I was not closely following the earlier
> exchange, I wanted to hear from Michael if everything is now good
> with v8, which hasn't happened as far as I recall.

Thanks.  I've incorporated Michael Haggerty's suggestions into v9.

> Also in $gmane/273828 [*1*] you hinted (but without showing a firm
> commitment) that there might be a reroll coming, which was another
> reason why I wasn't in a hurry to merge v8 iteration down to 'next'.

The current version does not use the term "pseudoref" (it is used in the refs backend series, and added to the glossary in those patches).