Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sha1_name: get_sha1_with_context learns to follow symlinks
- From
David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
- Date
- May 9, 2015, 20:34 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1431203670.24139.5.camel@ubuntu>
- In-Reply-To
- <xmqqlhgxhcqb.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On Sat, 2015-05-09 at 10:39 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes: > > > dturner@twopensource.com writes: > > > >> From: David Turner <dturner@twitter.com> > >> > >> Wire up get_sha1_with_context to call get_tree_entry_follow_symlinks > >> when GET_SHA1_FOLLOW_SYMLINKS is passed in flags. G_S_FOLLOW_SYMLINKS > >> is incompatible with G_S_ONLY_TO_DIE because the diagnosis that > >> ONLY_TO_DIE triggers does not consider symlinks. > > > > Is "does not consider" something fundamental, or it just happens to > > be that way right now? > > Regardless of the answer to this question, I find the last part of > this hunk puzzling.
You're right -- this code is wrong, for the reasons you explain. I'm going to follow your earlier suggestion and use a strbuf for the new field.