Re: [cosmetic bug?] needlessly(?) executable files
- From
Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
- Date
- Feb 23, 2015, 13:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1424696893.4662.5.camel@scientia.net>
- In-Reply-To
- <1424679663.30155.30.camel@kaarsemaker.net>
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 09:21 +0100, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> It used to be for a brief period in history, between daa22c6f8d (2.1.0) > and 1f32ecf (2.2.2).
Ah thanks,... I have 2.1.4 which explains this :)
Cheers, Chris.