git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH 2/5] fetch doc: update note on '+' in front of the refspec

From
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Date
May 29, 2014, 22:42 UTC
Message-ID
<1401403350-7122-3-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To
<1401403350-7122-1-git-send-email-gitster@pobox.com>

While it is not *wrong* per-se to say that pulling a rewound/rebased branch will lead to an unnecessary merge conflict, that is not what the leading "+" sign to allow non-fast-forward update of remote-tracking branch is at all.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt b/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt
index 18cffc2..2a7e2b7 100644
--- a/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt
+++ b/Documentation/pull-fetch-param.txt
@@ -24,15 +24,15 @@ is updated even if it does not result in a fast-forward
 update.
 +
 [NOTE]
-If the remote branch from which you want to pull is
-modified in non-linear ways such as being rewound and
-rebased frequently, then a pull will attempt a merge with
-an older version of itself, likely conflict, and fail.
-It is under these conditions that you would want to use
-the `+` sign to indicate non-fast-forward updates will
-be needed.  There is currently no easy way to determine
-or declare that a branch will be made available in a
-repository with this behavior; the pulling user simply
+When the remote branch you want to fetch is known to
+be rewound and rebased regularly, it is expected that
+the tip of it will not be descendant of the commit that
+used to be at its tip the last time you fetched it and
+stored in your remote-tracking branch.  You would want
+to use the `+` sign to indicate non-fast-forward updates
+will be needed for such branches.  There is no way to
+determine or declare that a branch will be made available
+in a repository with this behavior; the pulling user simply
 must know this is the expected usage pattern for a branch.
 +
 [NOTE]
-- 
2.0.0-479-g59ac8f9
Previous: Junio C HamanoNext: Marc Branchaud
Message 9 of 15 in “Documentation updates for 'git fetch'”
  1. 0/5 Documentation updates for 'git fetch'Junio C Hamano, May 29, 2014
  2. 1/5 fetch doc: update introductory part for clarityJunio C Hamano, May 29, 2014
  3. Marc BranchaudMay 30, 2014
  4. Junio C HamanoMay 30, 2014
  5. Marc BranchaudMay 30, 2014
  6. Junio C HamanoMay 30, 2014
  7. fetch doc: Move FETCH_HEAD material, and add an example.Marc Branchaud, Jun 2, 2014
  8. Junio C HamanoJun 2, 2014
  9. 2/5 fetch doc: update note on '+' in front of the refspecJunio C Hamano, May 29, 2014
  10. Marc BranchaudMay 30, 2014
  11. Junio C HamanoMay 30, 2014
  12. Marc BranchaudJun 2, 2014
  13. 3/5 fetch doc: remove notes on outdated "mixed layout"Junio C Hamano, May 29, 2014
  14. 4/5 fetch doc: on pulling multiple refspecsJunio C Hamano, May 29, 2014
  15. 5/5 fetch doc: update refspec format descriptionJunio C Hamano, May 29, 2014

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.