[PATCH 14/14] t1050-large.sh: use the $( ... ) construct for command substitution
- From
Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 28, 2014, 12:57 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1398689857-17014-14-git-send-email-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <1398689857-17014-1-git-send-email-gitter.spiros@gmail.com>
The Git CodingGuidelines prefer the $(...) construct for command substitution instead of using the backquotes `...`.
The backquoted form is the traditional method for command substitution, and is supported by POSIX. However, all but the simplest uses become complicated quickly. In particular, embedded command substitutions and/or the use of double quotes require careful escaping with the backslash character.
The patch was generated by:
for _f in $(find . -name "*.sh")
do
sed -i 's@`\(.*\)`@$(\1)@g' ${_f}
doneand then carefully proof-read.
Signed-off-by: Elia Pinto <gitter.spiros@gmail.com> --- t/t1050-large.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t1050-large.sh b/t/t1050-large.sh index fd10528..aea4936 100755 --- a/t/t1050-large.sh +++ b/t/t1050-large.sh @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ test_expect_success 'git-show a large file' ' ' test_expect_success 'index-pack' ' - git clone file://"`pwd`"/.git foo && + git clone file://"$(pwd)"/.git foo && GIT_DIR=non-existent git index-pack --strict --verify foo/.git/objects/pack/*.pack ' @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ test_expect_success 'repack' ' ' test_expect_success 'pack-objects with large loose object' ' - SHA1=`git hash-object huge` && + SHA1=$(git hash-object huge) && test_create_repo loose && echo $SHA1 | git pack-objects --stdout | GIT_ALLOC_LIMIT=0 GIT_DIR=loose/.git git unpack-objects &&
-- 1.7.10.4