[PATCH v4 0/1] general style: replaces memcmp() with starts_with()
- From
Quint Guvernator <quintus.public@gmail.com>
- Date
- Mar 17, 2014, 21:52 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1395093144-6786-1-git-send-email-quintus.public@gmail.com>
Hi again, all.
I've gone through the patch again to filter for the use of magic numbers so that I can leave those hunks alone. Junio says, and Michael agrees, that:
Show 5 quoted lines
> The original hunks show that the code knows and relies on magic numbers 7 > and 8 very clearly and there are rooms for improvement. The result after > the conversion, however, still have the same magic numbers, but one less > of them each. Doesn't it make it harder to later spot the patterns to > come up with a better abstraction that does not rely on the magic number?
I cut this one down very sharply; Michael says:
> It would be much better for you to submit only a handful of changes (or > even only one!) that is perfect, rather than throwing a bunch at the wall > and asking the reviewer to pick between the good and the bad.
Thanks for the guidance, everyone.
This work is microproject #14 for GSoC.
Quint Guvernator (1): general style: replaces memcmp() with starts_with()
builtin/apply.c | 6 +++--- builtin/for-each-ref.c | 2 +- builtin/mktag.c | 4 ++-- builtin/patch-id.c | 10 +++++----- connect.c | 4 ++-- imap-send.c | 6 +++--- remote.c | 2 +- 7 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
-- 1.9.0