git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

Naming Conventions for Branches

From
Tthaddeus <t-tcambron@trxtraining.com>
Date
Jul 12, 2011, 18:24 UTC
Message-ID
<1310495085285-6576242.post@n2.nabble.com>

Is it common to have a different name for each branch, descriptive of the project is contains or is it more common to have one dedicated name (for instance QA2) for the branch on which projects change based on need. Best

-- View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Naming-Conventions-for-Branches-tp6576242p6576242.html Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Message 1 of 1 in “Naming Conventions for Branches”
  1. thaddeusJul 12, 2011

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.