Difference between --date-order and reverse chronological order?
- From
Dun Peal <dunpealer@gmail.com>
- Date
- Apr 27, 2011, 15:15 UTC
- Message-ID
- <12e0244a-313e-4d67-9b91-c0d443276cff@k7g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>
Hi.
The git-log manpage defines --date-order:
"This option is similar to --topo-order in the sense that no parent comes before all of its children, but otherwise things are still ordered in the commit timestamp order."
But by Git's definition, for a child commit to be created, its parent must already exist. So even in reverse chronological order, all parents should come after all their children, no?
Thanks, D.