Re: [ANNOUNCE] TopGit v0.3
- From
- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-list@xs4all.nl>
- Date
- Sep 22, 2008, 09:13 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1222074825.6698.13.camel@heerbeest>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080921142445.GJ10360@machine.or.cz>
On zo, 2008-09-21 at 16:24 +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> The problem is that you can undo the merge content, but not the history > information. So this revert can e.g. propagate even into branches which > still *should* depend on the other branch, you get into trouble when you > want to make your branch depend on the other one anyway, etc.
Ah, yes. I see. Does this mean that functionality for easy adding and removing dependencies/patches from a branch can only be provided through some sort of [unpublishable] patch based mechanism like stgit?
Possibly we'd need a kind of setup where stgit-like patch branches can be "finalized" into topgit branches. Hmm.
Jan.
-- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org