Re: n-heads and patch dependency chains
- From
Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
- Date
- Apr 20, 2006, 18:08 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1145556505.5314.149.camel@cashmere.sps.mot.com>
- In-Reply-To
- <44325CDB.2000101@op5.se>
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 06:47, Andreas Ericsson wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> No, I mean that this would commit both to the testing branch (being the > result of several merged topic-branches) and to the topic-branch merged > in. Commit as in regular commit, with a commit-message and a patch. The > resulting repository would be the exact same as if the change was > committed only to the topic-branch and then cherry-picked on to the > testing-branch.
I am your number one fan! If I finish reading these 600+ messages, will I find out you have already implemented it, it's committed, and you just need me to test it now? :-)
jdl