Re: Database consistency after a successful pull
- From
- McMullan, Jason <jason.mcmullan@timesys.com>
- Date
- Jun 6, 2005, 18:30 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1118082657.8970.42.camel@jmcmullan.timesys>
- In-Reply-To
- <Pine.LNX.4.21.0506061000531.30848-100000@iabervon.org>
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:21 -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
Show 6 quoted lines
> [snip snip] > > My bias is to call a database consistent with only deltas having the > referents; the rest goes towards completeness, since you have and can read > everything that you have anything for (but may not be able to do some > particular operation).
Now, if we had consistent URIs for the .git/branches/* files, we could do 'lazy-pull' and really have our cake and eat it too.
-- Jason McMullan <jason.mcmullan@timesys.com> TimeSys Corporation