Re: Date handling.
- From
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
- Date
- Apr 14, 2005, 21:48 UTC
- Message-ID
- <1113515314.12012.235.camel@baythorne.infradead.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <425EDA43.3040404@zytor.com>
On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 14:01 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Both of these are metadata; they may not be directly relevant to the > filesystem, but are attributes relevant to the client thereof; > effectively an xattr.
Right. That's perfectly acceptable -- and that's the reason why I think it's also fine to keep the timezone and the rename information in there too. If we were being _really_ anal about auxiliary information being separate, we'd stick it in a separate blob object and merely refer to it from the commit object. I don't think there's really any call to take it that far, though.
-- dwmw2