git/list[1] front-page[2] threads[3] people[4] search[5] about
 

[PATCH v2] docs: clarify that refs/notes/ do not keep the attached objects alive

From
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Date
Feb 11, 2021, 07:18 UTC
Message-ID
<0bdc333b25aca1de82fea3a1f290fe30ee3ebf51.1613027889.git.martinvonz@google.com>
In-Reply-To
<e7fde2369495f32c7aa88c7b6b74ebee1a1bed24.1613000292.git.martinvonz@google.com>
`git help gc` contains this snippet:
  "[...] it will keep [..] objects referenced by the index,
  remote-tracking branches, notes saved by git notes under refs/notes/"

I had interpreted that as saying that the objects that notes were attached to are kept, but that is not the case. Let's clarify the documentation by moving out the part about git notes to a separate sentence.

Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
---
 Documentation/git-gc.txt | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-gc.txt b/Documentation/git-gc.txt
index 0c114ad1ca..52824269a8 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-gc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-gc.txt
@@ -117,12 +117,14 @@ NOTES
 'git gc' tries very hard not to delete objects that are referenced
 anywhere in your repository. In particular, it will keep not only
 objects referenced by your current set of branches and tags, but also
-objects referenced by the index, remote-tracking branches, notes saved
-by 'git notes' under refs/notes/, reflogs (which may reference commits
-in branches that were later amended or rewound), and anything else in
-the refs/* namespace.  If you are expecting some objects to be deleted
-and they aren't, check all of those locations and decide whether it
-makes sense in your case to remove those references.
+objects referenced by the index, remote-tracking branches, reflogs
+(which may reference commits in branches that were later amended or
+rewound), and anything else in the refs/* namespace. Notes saved by
+'git notes' under refs/notes/ will be kept, but the objects (typically
+commits) they are attached to will not be. If you are expecting some
+objects to be deleted and they aren't, check all of those locations
+and decide whether it makes sense in your case to remove those
+references.
 
 On the other hand, when 'git gc' runs concurrently with another process,
 there is a risk of it deleting an object that the other process is using
-- 
2.30.1.379.ge7fde23694
Previous: Martin von ZweigbergkNext: Junio C Hamano
Message 6 of 10 in “docs: clarify that refs/notes/ do not keep the attached objects alive”
  1. docs: clarify that refs/notes/ do not keep the attached objects aliveMartin von Zweigbergk, Feb 11, 2021
  2. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2021
  3. Martin von ZweigbergkFeb 11, 2021
  4. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2021
  5. Martin von ZweigbergkFeb 11, 2021
  6. docs: clarify that refs/notes/ do not keep the attached objects aliveMartin von Zweigbergk, Feb 11, 2021
  7. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2021
  8. Martin von ZweigbergkFeb 11, 2021
  9. docs: clarify that refs/notes/ do not keep the attached objects aliveMartin von Zweigbergk, Feb 11, 2021
  10. Junio C HamanoFeb 11, 2021

Read the whole thread, see it on lore, or plain text.

$ cat FOOTERMessages come from the public archive at lore.kernel.org/git, fetched every hour. The front page is chosen and written each morning by an AI editor and can be wrong; the threads themselves are the record. About and API. For agents: an MCP server at https://gitlist.dev/mcp, and any thread, story or person page as Markdown by adding .md to its URL (or sending Accept: text/markdown). Details in /llms.txt.