Re: Switching branches without committing changes
- From
- Joe Fiorini <joe@faithfulgeek.org>
- Date
- Mar 21, 2008, 04:40 UTC
- Message-ID
- <0A5FD247-A09E-4E3A-8BB5-35F9390E7FB3@faithfulgeek.org>
- In-Reply-To
- <20080321041013.GA2502@coredump.intra.peff.net>
Thanks for the replies. I definitely like the stashing approach. Is there any overhead or caveat to using stash a lot?
-Joe
On Mar 21, 2008, at 12:10 AM, Jeff King wrote:
Show 16 quoted lines
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:06:47AM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >> Use `git checkout -m` to switch the branch anyway. However, if >> there is a merge conflict while you are trying to carry the changes >> to the other branch you may be faced with a merge conflict you are >> not prepared to resolve, or simply cannot resolve in a reasonable >> period of time. > > Ah, for some reason I didn't think of '-m' in the advice I gave (I > guess > I have just never used it). It is almost certainly simpler than > using a > 'stash' at this point (but I do think stashing _beforehand_ still has > advantages). > > -Peff